Skip to main content
· 10/18/2016

Westawski v. Merck & Co.

Citations

  • 215 F. Supp. 3d 412
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144234
  • 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,662
  • 2016 WL 6082633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • per-mitting plaintiff to depose out-of-state experts by videoconferencing over defendant's objection; procedure satisfied requirement that witnesses be produced in-state and did not prejudice defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beetlestone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.