West Virginia v. CashCall, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the borrower “agree[s] that any Dispute . . . will be resolved by arbitration, which shall be conducted by the [CRST] Nation by an authorized representative”
• “[B]ecause the State only asserts state law claims against CashCall, a non-bank entity, the claims do not implicate the FDIA, the FDIA does not completely preempt the state-law claims, and there are no federal questions on the face of the Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).