Skip to main content
· 6/7/2001

West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. Ocwen Technology Xchange, Inc.

Citations

  • 200 F.R.D. 564
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7622
  • 2001 WL 629249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff “would have to demonstrate that each individual class member was misled” and that this inquiry “would require numerous individual verbal accounts as to what occurred and the conversations that took place”
  • finding that O’Neill could not show that he would fairly and adequately protect the interest of the class “[g]iven the likelihood of varied circumstances of the proposed class members”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.