· 11/8/2010
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. v. Huffman
Citations
- 625 F.3d 159
- 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20014
- 72 ERC (BNA) 1135
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23170
- 2010 WL 4400497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that NPDES “permits set forth limitations on the type and quantity of pollutants that will ultimately be released into navigable waters”
- explaining that “pollutant” is broadly defined
- explaining that “pollutant” is broadly defined
- “[W]here . . . the mine owner generates pollution but then abandons the site, the subsequent operator is the party responsible for obtaining a permit”
- “In other words, the statute takes the water’s point of view: water is indifferent about who initially polluted it so long as pollution continues to occur.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.