Skip to main content
· 11/8/2010

West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. v. Huffman

Citations

  • 625 F.3d 159
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20014
  • 72 ERC (BNA) 1135
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23170
  • 2010 WL 4400497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that NPDES “permits set forth limitations on the type and quantity of pollutants that will ultimately be released into navigable waters”
  • explaining that “pollutant” is broadly defined
  • explaining that “pollutant” is broadly defined
  • “[W]here . . . the mine owner generates pollution but then abandons the site, the subsequent operator is the party responsible for obtaining a permit”
  • “In other words, the statute takes the water’s point of view: water is indifferent about who initially polluted it so long as pollution continues to occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.