West Virginia Department of Highways v. Fisher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “in condemnation proceedings, a landowner may express his opinion concerning the value of his land” (citations omitted); Toppins v. Oshel, 89 S.E.2d 359, 368 (W. Va. 1955
• in condemnation proceedings, owner may express Ms opimon con-cermng the value of Ms or her land
• “in condemnation proceedings, a landowner may express his opinion concerning the value of his land”
• physician-patient privilege existed between a party and a prospective juror; although not disqualification per se, the likelihood of bias or prejudice was sufficient to require the verdict to be set aside
• physician-patient privilege existed between a party and a prospective juror; although not disqualification per se, the likelihood of bias or prejudice was sufficient to require the verdict to be set aside
• “[T]he mere statement of a prospective juror that he or she is not biased with respect to a particular cause may not be sufficient for the trial court to conclude that no such bias exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).