Skip to main content

West v. State

Citations

  • 80 Miss. 710

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal Law. Jurors. Special venire. Jury boxes exhausted. Mode of selecting veniremen.</p> <p>Where the jury boxes are exhausted and a special venire facias is directed to the sheriff commanding him to summon jurors, it is no objection to the venire that the sheriff, acting in good faith, with-the aid of a deputy, selected the names of an equal number of qualified jurors from each supervisor’s district of the county, using the registration and assessment rolls in so doing, and caused the jurors so selected to be summoned.</p> <p>2. Same. Service of venire. Mode.</p> <p>The jurors being in attendance on the court, the mode of the service of the venire on them is unimportant, and a litigant cannot predicate error of the mode of service on them, or the want of it.</p> <p>3. Same. Disqualified jurors not objected to. Supreme court practice, Code 1893, l 4370.</p> <p>If a juror on his voir dire disclose facts rendering him disqualified, a defendant who declines to object to him for cause cannot, after verdict, complain of the disqualification, and the case falls on ap-, peal within code 1893, J 4370, prohibiting reversals by the supreme court for errors not made the ground of special exception in the court below.</p> <p>4. Same. Murder. ' Instruction. Jury unable to agree on punishment. Code 1893, § 1439.</p> <p>If the jury in a murder case agree on defendant’s guilt, but cannot agree on the punishment (under code 1893, g 1439), it should return a general verdict of guilty, and the court may so instruct.</p>

Judges: Terral

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.