West v. Rochkind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no dispute that a negligence case may be proven using only circumstantial evidence, so long as it creates ‘a reasonable likelihood or probability rather than a possibility’ supporting a ‘rational inference of causation’ and is not “wholly speculative.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-20· cited 49×
• Rowhouses, Inc. v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-25· cited 39×
• Hamilton v. Dackman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-05· cited 12×
• Rogers v. Home Equity USA, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-26· cited 8×
• Barr v. Rochkind
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-09-29· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peterson v. Underwood
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-06· cited 147×
• Myers v. Bright
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-06· cited 33×
• Ross v. Housing Authority
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-22· cited 33×
• Dow v. L & R Properties, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 26×
• Taylor v. Fishkind
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-31· cited 25×
• Lyon v. Campbell
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-01· cited 24×
• Otis Elevator Co. v. Lepore
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-06-07· cited 20×