West v. Paseur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that the standard of review is not de novo, but is the narrow “arbitrary and capricious” standard for both fact and law
• clarifying that the standard of review is not de novo, but is the narrow “arbitrary and capricious” standard for both facts and law
• rejecting the de novo standard of review and holding the proper standard of review of issues of statutory construction is deference to the determination of the special master
• “a mere temporal association between the injury and the vaccination is not enough”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).