Skip to main content
· 2/2/2004

West v. Newberry Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Citations

  • 593 S.E.2d 500
  • 357 S.C. 537
  • 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an issue neither addressed by the trial judge in the final order nor mentioned in a subsequent motion for reconsideration is not preserved for review
  • holding an issue that was neither addressed by the trial court in the final order nor raised in a Rule 59(e), SCACR, motion was unpreserved for review by this court
  • holding an issue that is neither addressed by the circuit court in its final order nor raised by way of a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion is not preserved for review
  • finding an issue that is neither addressed by the trial court in its final order nor raised by way of a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion is not preserved for review
  • finding an issue was not preserved when it was not explicitly ruled on by the trial court in its final order and the appellant did not raise the issue in a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to alter or amend the judgment
  • \The doctrine of promissory estoppel is equitable in nature.\ (citing 28 Am. Jur. 2d Estoppel and Waiver §§ 1, 55 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Goolsby, Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.