West v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the male co-worker did not sexually harass the plaintiff after their relationship ended, but before she was fired, the plaintiff did not state a quid pro quo discrimination claim
• analyzing whether the defendant’s numerous phone calls to plaintiff after the end of their consensual relationship established a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim, but ultimately concluding they did not because the plaintiff did not answer the phone
• “[The defendant’s] alleged actions were because of his animosity towards [the plaintiff] for ending the consensual relationship rather than her gender.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).