· 11/4/1929
West v. Lyders
Citations
- 36 F.2d 108
- 59 App. D.C. 122
- 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “use of a vitriolic tone” is not extreme and 2 outrageous
- discussing ORS 9.390 and its requirement that adverse party receive notice of withdrawal of counsel, and distinguishing Bridge
- noting judgment language that “allowed” counsel to withdraw and provided that the trial court clerk “may” enter the withdrawal of record
- dis- cussing similarly ambiguous provision in judgment
- dis- cussing similarly ambiguous provision in judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orsdel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.