West v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that exigent circumstances can arise from a need to prevent a defendant from destroying biological evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-08-03· cited 9×
• Ceon Maurice Fauntleroy v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-07-30· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Mahon-Haft
  Radford County Circuit Court· 2013-09-20

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Brinegar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
• Welsh v. Wisconsin
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
• Silverman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
• Verez v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1985-11-27· cited 94×
• Hollis v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-04-23· cited 85×
• Jefferson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-03-31· cited 60×
• United States v. Orville Reed, A/K/A Sonny Reed
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-05-29· cited 30×
• State v. Welker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-05-21· cited 21×
• State v. Hardin
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-12-19· cited 21×
• Al-Karrien v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-04-02· cited 17×
• State v. Vice
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-07-18· cited 7×