West v. Carolina Life Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “loss of the opportunity to fairly compete for a contract constitutes irreparable harm”
• finding an agency acted unreasonably when, for example, it assessed a strength to the awardee but did not assess a similar strength for similar facts to the pro-testo!’
• “[AJnswers [to bidder’s questions], when circulated to all [bidders] as an attachment to an amendment signed by the contracting officer, constitute an amendment of the solicitation.”
• “GAO decisions support the view that such answers, when circulated to all offerors as an attachment to an amendment signed by the contracting officer, constitute an amendment of the solicitation.”
• “The court considers the loss of potential profits from a large government contract award, in this instance, to constitute irreparable harm.” (citing ViroMed Labs., Inc. v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 493, 503 (2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).