West Telemarketing Corp. Outbound v. McClure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in determining award for 128 weeks of back pay, “[t]he jury could have based lost earnings on Appellee’s highest weekly earnings statement”
• explaining that, in determining award for 128 weeks of back pay, \[t]he jury could have based lost earnings on Appellee's highest weekly earnings statement\
• noting that employee “had testified that she had intended to continue working for [employer] until her retirement” and that “[t]he jury was entitled to believe her”
• noting that employee \had testified that she had intended to continue working for [employer] until her retirement\ and that \[t]he jury was entitled to believe her\
• calculating range of back pay in a sufficiency review from the date of termination until the month of trial
• plaintiff felt “crushed,” her body “br[oke] down,” and she “was confined to her bed” at times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).