West Point Marion Coal Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that faulty workmanship is not an \occurrence\ because it is a failure to perform under the contract, which cannot be characterized as unexpected
• concluding that faulty workmanship is not an “occurrence” because it is a failure to perform under the contract, which cannot be characterized as unexpected
• holding subcontractor’s “deficient” painting work was not an accident and, therefore, not an occurrence under the CGL policy
• holding deficient performance of a construction contract cannot be an accident under a CGL policy
• holding costs for the repair of a subcontractor’s deficient work did not arise from an accident under the CGL policy, but leaving open the question when there is damage to other property
• holding costs for the repair of a subcontractor’s deficient work did not arise from an accident under the CGL policy, but leaving open the question when there is damage to other property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).