West Ohio II, LLC v. Marion County Assessor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the fact that employee used his car at work for the employer’s benefit did not render the drive to work “special circumstances” warranting respondeat superior liability
• “Driving to and from work is generally not considered to be within the scope of a servant’s employment.... ” (emphasis added)
• “The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.”
• “The ‘right to control’ concept is key to a respondeat superior analysis in the motor vehicle context.”
• “[A] loss of consortium claim is derivative of the injured spouse’s claim for personal injury[.]”
• “[A] consortium claim must be filed jointly by a couple and tried concurrently with the claim of the physically injured spouse in order to avoid duplication of awards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).