Skip to main content
· 4/19/1972

West Hartford Education Assn., Inc. v. DeCourcy

Citations

  • 162 Conn. 566
  • 295 A.2d 526
  • 1972 Conn. LEXIS 904
  • 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that grievance procedure provides “an amicable and efficient means of resolving any differences within a contract previously acceptable to and executed by the parties”
  • relying on interpretations by National Labor Relations Board because Connecticut statutes dealing with labor relations closely patterned after National Labor Relations Act
  • private sector view of wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment is not easily superimposed on the field of education
  • court stated that if the submission of certain subjects to binding arbitration is unlawful, the topic is beyond the scope of negotiability
  • whether extracurricular activities should take place was management decision; effect of those activities on teacher assignments mandatory subject of negotiation
  • ‘‘[t]he significance of calling something a ‘condition of employment’ is that it then becomes a mandatory subject of collective bargaining’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Thim, Ryan, Shapiro, Loiselle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.