West Goshen Township v. Crater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that to qualify for a special exception, landowners were required to “prove by objective evidence that [the lot at issue] was ‘separate and distinct’ and not part of a larger, integrated tract owned by them, or by a predecessor, at the time of the ordinance’s enactment”
• the burdened party failed to demonstrate an objective intent to keep the lots separate; instead, the two lots had merged
• denying a special exception and separately analyzing a variance request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).