West Deptford Energy, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that FERC need not confine rates to specific numbers when ratepayers have notice of the formula or rule that will be applied
• holding that Section 1983 claims use California's statute of 15 limitations for personal injury claims, which is two years
• explaining that federal courts borrow state law equitable tolling 19 provisions, unless they are inconsistent with federal law, and setting forth California's doctrine of 20 equitable tolling
• noting that because West Deptford repeatedly objected to any such imposition of cost responsibility, \one-way assertions\ in a facilities study agreement cannot put a party on notice, and Commission precedent treats such studies as \non-binding estimate of costs\
• vacating agency action because, inter alia, the agency “provided no reasoned explanation for how its decision comports with *** prior agency practice”
• vacating agency action because, inter alia, the agency “provided no reasoned explanation for how its decision comports with * * * prior agency practice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).