· 6/26/1981
West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson
Citations
- 306 N.W.2d 893
- 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- piercing corporate veil when defendant “personally received the proceeds” of a contract with the corporation and the corporation “is now virtually inactive”
- “Every person who undertakes to deal with an agent is put on inquiry and must discover whether the agent has the authority to complete the proposed act”
- to invoke estoppel doctrine, “truth must have been unknown” to party when he acted
- “Negligence by the party invoking [estoppel] may deprive him of its protection.” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.