Skip to main content
· 7/14/2004

Wessling v. State

Citations

  • 877 So. 2d 877
  • 2004 WL 1562893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Exclusion of exculpatory evidence denies a defendant his fundamental right to defend himself in violation of the Sixth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.