Skip to main content
· 8/14/2015

Wesley McDivitt v. Sue McDivitt

Citations

  • 42 N.E.3d 115
  • 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 581
  • 2015 WL 4857147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning
  • when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
  • when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
  • when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
  • a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning
  • a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Najam, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.