· 8/14/2015
Wesley McDivitt v. Sue McDivitt
Citations
- 42 N.E.3d 115
- 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 581
- 2015 WL 4857147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning
- when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
- when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
- when a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be examined to determine the parties’ reasonable expectations
- a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning
- a contract may be ambiguous if its terms are susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent persons would honestly differ as to its meaning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Najam, Friedlander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.