Werwinski v. Ford Motor Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Pennsylvania's economic loss doctrine barred plaintiffs’ claim under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law
• explaining that federal courts should “opt for the interpretation that restricts liability, rather than expands it” until the state’s highest court decides differently
• discussing cases from the Eleventh Circuit, Eighth Circuit, Seventh Circuit, District of Minnesota, Eastern District of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Florida
• “[C]laims, whether related or unrelated, of a single plaintiff against a single defendant may be aggregated.”
• “[C]laims, whether related or unrelated, of a single plaintiff against a single defendant may be aggregated.”
• “On the other hand, appellants are unable to explain why contract remedies are inadequate to provide redress when the alleged misrepresentation relates to the quality or characteristics of the goods sold.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).