Werth v. Ollis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment when the foreclosing bank produced a copy of the note containing an indorsement
• \Standing refers to a party's right to make a legal claim or seek judicial enforcement of a duty or right.\ (quoting Powell ex rel. Kelley v. Bank of Am., 379 S.C. 437, 444, 665 S.E.2d 237, 241 (Ct. App. 2008))
• \Standing refers to a party's right to make a legal claim or seek judicial enforcement of a duty or right.\ (omissions by court) (quoting Powell ex rel. Kelley v. Bank of Am., 379 S.C. 437, 444, 665 S.E.2d 237, 241 (Ct. App. 2008))
• \Standing refers to a party's right to make a legal claim or seek judicial enforcement of a duty or right.\ (omissions by court) (quoting Powell ex rel. Kelley v. Bank of Am., 379 S.C. 437, 444, 665 S.E.2d 237, 241 (Ct. App. 2008))
• “A mortgage and a note are separate securities for the same debt, and a mortgagee who has a note and a mortgage to secure a debt has the option to either bring an action on the note or to pursue a foreclosure action.”
• \An assignee stands in the shoes of its assignor.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).