Werner v. Scharlop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that respondent’s behavior caused substantial emo tional distress when he “continued to call, write letters and send e-mails to the victim” for a year, despite petitioner’s repeatedly telling him “that she wanted no further contact with him”
• finding that the evidence supported the trial court's determination that the appellant's actions caused the appellee substantial emotional distress, \which is all that is required when the injunction is predicated upon repeated acts of stalking\
• affirming an injunction where the evidence showed that a defendant’s harassment caused substantial emotional distress to the stalking victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).