Werner v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that payment arrangements between a party and an expert witness “is legitimate subject matter for comment to the jury” and “is admissible for whatever effect it may have on [the expert witness’s] credibility”
• requiring a new trial when, inter alia, references were made to the fact that plaintiff was receiving state-subsidized medical care
• “[R]emunerative arrangements between parties and their expert witnesses is legitimate subject matter for comment to the jury. . . .”
• medical care and hospitalization provided by state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).