Werner G. Hood v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court reviews the Board’s factual findings under the “clearly erroneous” standard
• holding that the Court reviews the Board's factual findings under the \clearly erroneous\ standard
• remanding for the Board to resolve whether a VA investigative medical report should be considered a \quality assurance\ report and shielded from disclosure in connection with a veteran's section 1151 claim
• “The Court reviews factual findings under the ‘clearly erroneous’ standard such that it will not disturb a Board finding unless, based on the record as a whole, the Court is convinced that the finding is incorrect.”
• medical opinions that are speculative have “little probative value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).