E.D. New York· 1/28/2008
Wentworth v. Hedson
Citations
- 248 F.R.D. 123
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6059
- 2008 WL 246214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no private right of action under Rule 11”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reyes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 1,257×
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
- Quaker Oats Co. v. Sands, Taylor & Wood Co.Supreme Court· 1993-04-19· cited 91×
- Emmanuel D. Patterson v. Thomas A. Coughlin, III Charles P. Hemandy Harold J. Smith N. DesantosSecond Circuit· 1990-05-16· cited 81×
- Port Drum Company v. Walter Umphrey and Kurt B. ChaconFifth Circuit· 1988-08-16· cited 51×
- Sassower v. FieldSecond Circuit· 1992-08-13· cited 49×
- Wentworth v. HedsonE.D. New York· 2007-06-26· cited 27×
- Azoulay v. CassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-07-30· cited 11×
- Wentworth v. HedsonE.D. New York· 2008-01-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.