Skip to main content
· 3/23/2007

Wentland v. Uhlarik

Citations

  • 159 P.3d 1035
  • 37 Kan. App. 2d 734
  • 2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court does not reassess the trial court's credibility determinations
  • \The trial court cannot be accused of abusing its discretion in the admission of evidence when the complaining party failed to object and thereby give the trial court an opportunity to exercise its discretion on the matter.\
  • stalking act con strued liberally to protect victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Greene, McAnany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.