· 1/15/1832
Went v. Morgan
Citations
- 3 La. 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting State's argument that \a Legislature could ... insulate itself from a Shaw -type challenge simply by re-enacting its plan and claiming that it made no decisions about who to include in the district at the time of re-enactment\
- discuss- ing Circuit precedent regarding the showing needed for “a plaintiff [to] meet the purpose standard”
- “Defend- ants did not accept [these findings] and instead appealed to the Supreme Court”
- “Further, the Legislature did not engage in a deliberative process to ensure that the 2013 plans cured any taint from the 2011 plans.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.