Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address issue of whether Minnesota Constitution is more restrictive because of property owner’s failure to raise issue
• describing how in Zeman, an owner who had used his property as a rental dwelling for 20 years had investment-backed expectations in that continued use
• “[T]he property owner must actually have invested money in connection with its reasonable expectations regarding the proposed use of the property.”
• “Because the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the [respondent], we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to . . . the party against whom summary judgment was granted.”
• considering the Penn Central factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).