Skip to main content
· 12/20/1993

Wenrick v. Crater

Citations

  • 315 Ark. 361
  • 868 S.W.2d 60
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding preexisting condition jury charge where plaintiff suing for injuries from a car accident had been involved in a similar car accident from which he suffered similar injuries fifteen months earlier
  • \[A] charge may be given when there is slight evidence to sustain it.\ (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[A] charge may be given when there is slight evidence to sustain it.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “A back injury resulting from a car accident does not raise a medical question requiring expert testimony on causation.”
  • plaintiff not required to present expert testimony about whether the car accident caused his back injury or aggravated a pre-existing back injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.