Wenninger v. Wenninger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the district court “explained how the guideline . . . did not adequately account for[] [the defendant’s] particular offense conduct”
• rejecting substantive-reasonableness challenge where “the district court not only explained at great length why it was concerned about [the antitrust guideline] in general, but more importantly, explained how the guideline applied to (or rather, did not adequately account for
• affirming categorical rejection of Guideline for antitrust offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).