Wenger v. Canastota Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he IDEA does not provide for compensatory money damages”
• relying on Brantley 6 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 625, 936 F. Supp. 649, 657 (D. 7 Minn. 1996) (citing Monahan v. Nebraska, 687 F.2d 1164, 8 1170-71 (8th Cir. 1982))
• “[S]omething more than a mere violation of the IDEA is necessary in order to show a violation of Section 504”
• dismissing plaintiffs’ claim of disability discrimination where plaintiffs failed to show that defendant acted in bad faith or gross misjudgment in making “IDEA-type educational decisions”
• “[S]omething more than a mere violation of the IDEA is necessary in order to show a violation of Section 504 in the context of educating children with disabilities . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).