Skip to main content
· 5/25/1959

Wengenroth v. Texas

Citations

  • 359 U.S. 1002
  • 79 S. Ct. 1139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding attorney’s fees because claims were time-barred and it was “patently clear” that party had “absolutely no chance of success”
  • summary judgment proper when parties collaterally estopped from relitigating issue already presented and considered in arbitration proceeding
  • \An equitable claim [for unjust enrichment] cannot proceed where the plaintiff has had and let pass an adequate alternative remedy at law.\
  • “if by necessary implication the issue dispositive of the present action is contained in that which has been explicitly decided, it will be the basis for collateral estoppel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.