Skip to main content
· 7/7/2015

Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election Commission

Citations

  • 417 App. D.C. 1
  • 793 F.3d 1
  • 417 U.S. App. D.C. 1
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11625
  • 2015 WL 4079575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The paradigmatic locations where general jurisdiction is appropriate 21 over a corporation are its place of incorporation and its principal place of business.”
  • a plaintiff “does not have to prove that the discriminatory 20 purpose was the sole purpose of the challenged action, but only that it was a 21 ‘motivating factor.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown, Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.