· 7/7/2015
Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election Commission
Citations
- 417 App. D.C. 1
- 793 F.3d 1
- 417 U.S. App. D.C. 1
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11625
- 2015 WL 4079575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The paradigmatic locations where general jurisdiction is appropriate 21 over a corporation are its place of incorporation and its principal place of business.”
- a plaintiff “does not have to prove that the discriminatory 20 purpose was the sole purpose of the challenged action, but only that it was a 21 ‘motivating factor.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown, Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.