Skip to main content
· 11/2/1999

Wendy J. Norville v. Staten Island University Hospital

Citations

  • 196 F.3d 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff faded to establish a prima facie case where there was no evidence about the type of work done or the degree of impairment of other allegedly “similarly situated” employees
  • holding that similarly situated means being subject to the same performance standards and engaging in similar conduct
  • holding that similarly situated means 14 being subject to the same performance standards and engaging in the same conduct
  • explaining that “[a] plaintiff may support an inference of race discrimination by demonstrating that similarly situated employees of a different race were treated more favorably”
  • finding that a “plaintiff may support an inference of race discrimination by demonstrating that similarly situated employees of a different race were treated more favorably.”
  • concluding plaintiff did not show other employees were subject to the same standards governing performance, evaluation and discipline, nor engaged in conduct similar to the plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Cabranes, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.