Wendy Hong Wu v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining as matter of law that franchisor not vicariously liable for franchisee’s security deficiencies because franchise agreement did not give franchisor “considerable control . . . over the specific instrumentality at issue”
• determining as matter of law that franchisor not vicariously liable for franchisee's security deficiencies because franchise agreement did not give franchisor \considerable control . . . over the specific instrumentality at issue\
• “In deciding whether the franchisor’s actions give rise to a legal duty, courts typically draw distinctions between recommendations and requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).