Wendy Hernandez v. Armadillo Glass, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that while a court may appoint standby counsel, Faretta does not require it to permit “‘hybrid’ representation”
• holding that a petitioner’s sixth amendment right to conduct his own defense was not violated by participation of standby counsel
• recognizing that although court may appoint standby counsel, Faretta does not require or authorize \hybrid\ representation
• holding that no absolute bar on standby counsel’s unsolicited participation is appropriate or intended by the holding in Faretta
• recognizing that while a court may appoint stand-by counsel, Faretta does not require it to permit \`hybrid' representation\
• holding that pro se defendant’s right to self-representation was not violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).