Wendy Fiero v. CSG Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s “placement on [a] PIP alone does not constitute an adverse employment action and cannot support her claim of retaliation”
• holding that “performance-related concerns” is a nondiscriminatory reason to fire an employee
• assuming without deciding that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case of sex discrimination and proceeding to consider the employer’s proffered justification and evidence of pretext
• finding “performance-related concerns constitute legitimate, non-discriminatory justifications for discharging” an employee
• plaintiff's \placement on the PIP alone does not constitute an adverse employment action and cannot support her claim of retaliation\
• once prima facie case established and nondiscriminatory reason offered, burden shifts back to plaintiff to establish pretext and a reasonable inference of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).