Wendt v. Kerkhof

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the trial court erred by finding that a legal doctrine applied to the plaintiffs’ nuisance claim, any error was harmless because the trial court nevertheless made a proper ruling and the plaintiffs did not show they were prejudiced
• farm changed from decades of grain farming to hog farming five years after plaintiffs became adjacent landowners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).