Wendt v. Horowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sending negligent legal work into Florida could give rise to personal jurisdiction but declining to decide whether it did in that case
• holding that telephonic, electronic or written communication into the state may permit exercise of jurisdiction under the long-arm statute, provided the tort arises from the communication
• holding that a nonresident defendant’s telephonic, electronic, or written communications into Florida can amount to committing a tortious act in Florida
• holding that a trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal ju-risdictioh is reviewed de novo on appeal
• holding that “physical presence is not necessarily required to satisfy the constitutionally mandated requirement of minimum contacts”
• holding that “telephonic, electronic, or written communications into Florida may form the basis for personal jurisdiction under section 48.193(1)(b)6 if the alleged cause of action arises from the communications”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).