Wendler v. DePaul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comments that adversely reflect on a plaintiff's fitness for her profession are defamatory, but criticism of her job performance is not
• “While appellant’s job performance was criticized, he was not accused of dishonesty or anything else that would ‘blacken [his] reputation or [ ] expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.’”
• supervisor’s confidential report on employee and his work performance non-defamatory
• ciimp Corabi, 441 Pa. at 447, 273 A.2d 899

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).