Skip to main content
· 7/15/1924

Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.

Citations

  • 300 F. 404
  • 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enforcing an agreement that “fixes and defines the existing trademark of each” party — one to the Hygeia mark in connection with distilled water, and the other in connection with natural mineral or spring water
  • “No larger claim can be maintained than was possessed by the source of title, and the right is subject to the same equities, abandonment, or estoppel which could be asserted against the vendor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.