Skip to main content
· 11/16/2005

Wen Ho Lee v. Department of Justice

Citations

  • 401 F. Supp. 2d 123
  • 34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1033
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27929
  • 2005 WL 3078817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that protecting reporters from forced disclosure of their confidential sources “would undermine the fundamental purpose of the Privacy Act”
  • \The reporter must answer questions for information (1) that is \central\ to the plaintiff's case and (2) as to which the plaintiff has exercised all reasonable alternatives to obtain elsewhere.\
  • “The reporter must answer questions for information (1) that is “central” to the plaintiffs case and (2) as to which the plaintiff has exercised all reasonable alternatives to obtain elsewhere.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.