Wemhoff v. Investors Management Corp. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an in-court admission that the oral agreement exists, though not necessarily a complete statement of the essential terms of the contract, is adequate to bar the defense under statute
• an in-court admission that the oral agreement exists, though not necessarily a complete statement of the essential terms of the contract, is adequate to bar the defense under statute
• “[T]he statute of frauds does not require an exhaustive, integrated statement of the agreement in writing, but only a sufficient statement to establish that there in fact was an agreement and that the party charged should be bound by it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).