Wembley Investment Co. v. Herrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that nonmovant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of nonreceipt
• concluding that nonmovant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of nonreceipt
• concluding that nonmovant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of nonreceipt
• concluding that non-movant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of non-receipt
• concluding that non-movant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of non-receipt
• concluding that nonmovant had not been served with motion of nonsuit when presumption of receipt raised by certificate of service was rebutted by evidence of nonreceipt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).