· 12/15/2008
Welshans v. United States Postal Service
Citations
- 550 F.3d 1100
- 185 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2559
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25068
- 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,404
- 2008 WL 5207014
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that U.S. Postal Service employees are excluded from the application of 5 U.S.C. § 6323
- “the exchange I heard does not support” Pardun’s accounting of events
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Schall, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.