Welsh v. Hagler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Defendant Jemmie Welch “should have named the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution as the sole defendant, not the Smithsonian and two of its employees”
• finding plaintiff had no intent to begin EEO process as emails “merely describe[d] the events that transpired” and “sought to clarify [plaintiff’s] reasonable accommodation”
• “Under the FTCA, ‘the United States is the only proper party defendant.’” (citation omitted)
• (the federal employee likely would be granted leave to amend if the complaint was not liberally construed, and the defendant would not be prejudiced by a liberal construction of the complaint
• analyzing communications to determine whether they showed requisite intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).