Louisiana Court of Appeal· 9/24/2014
Wells v. Wells
Citations
- 150 So. 3d 907
- 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2278
- 2014 WL 4724636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The proper vehicle for a substantive change in a judgment [in Louisiana] is a timely motion for a new trial or a timely appeal.”
- appellate court vacated amended judgment which changed amount awarded to wife from one-half the amount by which her mortgage payments after the separation reduced the principal debt on the mortgage to one-half the amount she paid on the mortgage from her separate funds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chaisson, Liljeberg, Wicker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Villaume v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-10-09· cited 149×
- Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-11-14· cited 79×
- Bourgeois v. KostSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-05-20· cited 75×
- Jones v. GillenLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-06-06· cited 55×
- Starnes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-10-06· cited 40×
- Terry v. TerryLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-12-23· cited 8×
- Scruggs v. Minton Equipment Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-12-09· cited 7×
- Rebco Marine, Inc. v. Homestead Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-12-29· cited 7×
- Wells v. WellsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-01-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.